VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12 ]
Subject: The Difference


Author:
Linda
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 00:03:05 07/07/02 Sun

The difference in the two cases and I believe will result in no damages is: In the Jenny Jones/Schmitz case the show was negligent in telling Schmitz that the "secret admirer" was a gay man, this was brought out in the criminal case. In the Springer/Panitz case, all parties knew exactly why they were there. Was there any testimony in the Panitz criminal case, pointing the finger at the Springer Show for wrong doing?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: The DifferenceChris11:04:31 07/07/02 Sun
Re: The DifferenceBob08:43:08 07/08/02 Mon
Re: The DifferenceElli11:46:19 07/08/02 Mon


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.