Re: Panitz judge won't do Springer trial -- Panitz Murder Trial Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

Subject:

Re: Panitz judge won't do Springer trial

Author:
Gina

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:28:20 07/27/02 Sat
In reply to: Chris 's message, "Re: Panitz judge won't do Springer trial" on 20:53:22 07/27/02 Sat

Cindy & Chris, I agree with your statements that this mess started long before the Springer show made it's debut; but, people go to arbitration for one reason only..to avoid a trial and all that it entails. The fact that Springers people want arbitration tells me that it is going to result in a big money settlement and they want some control over the amount. Think back to the JJ debacle; Amedure and Schmitz (sp) knew each other before the show ever was taped, needless to say, and it was Amedure who contacted the show. Do you think anybody would have been killed had it not been for the show? I don't. Further, I doubt anyone would have been killed had it not been for the appearance on JS. Putting your dirty laundry out in the public venue is a recipe for disaster. I hear your logic, but there is no logic in this situation. I'll bet you a trip to Michigan that this ends up in money damages. Remember what the Judge said? Now,go and find a non-biased jury to come to the conclusion that the JS show had "no fault". You have a trashy show host; a convicted murderer; a murderers wife who was in on the whole sham - and a "poor, unfortunate, woman" who died as a result. Add to that the poor, unfortunate, womans "devastated" family and you've got big bucks. Betcha!!!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Panitz judge won't do Springer trial	Cindy	08:07:25 07/28/02 Sun
Re: Panitz judge won't do Springer trial -- Elli, 14:17:27 07/28/02 Sun Re: Panitz judge won't do Springer trial -- Linda, 00:46:00 07/29/02 Mon Re: Panitz judge won't do Springer trial -- Linda, 00:46:45 07/29/02 Mon Re: Panitz judge won't do Springer trial -- Cindy, 07:36:06 07/29/02 Mon Re: Panitz judge won't do Springer trial -- Bob, 07:50:18 07/29/02 Mon