Re: Which one is the real one? Look -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:24:08 02/14/12 Tue
Author: George
Subject: Re: Which one is the real one? Look
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Re: Which one is the real one? Look" on 00:22:50 02/14/12 Tue

>>>The Community of Christ, as I have
>>>endeavored to point out in this thread, tries to be
>>>all things to all people. That is the reason that
>they
>>>will be having National Conferences in the USA,
>>>Canada, and Australia/New Zealand in order to get
>>>homosexuality officially in place in "parts" of the
>>>church. They believe that Christians can operate at
>>>any moral level. Wrong!
>>>
>>>If you want to see the fracture in the Community of
>>>Christ, which they are so intent in trying to hide
>>>check out these two Facebook groups.
>>>------------
>>>
>>>Community of Christ
>>>Church/Religious Organization � Independence,
>Missouri
>>>
>>>https://www.facebook.com/CommunityofChrist.RLDSChurch
>>>
>>>This is the official Facebook page in which they try
>>>keep everything squeaky clean and sweet.
>>>----------
>>>
>>>Community of Christ (open group)
>>>
>>> >>>href="http://www.facebook.com/groups/2205071906/">htt
>p
>>:
>>>//www.facebook.com/groups/2205071906/
>>>
>>>This is the unofficial Facebook page on which
>>>homosexuals, atheists, and agnostics reign supreme.
>>>
>>>Jesus spoke of white-washed sepulchers.
>>>---------------
>>>
>>>Submitted by Lois
>>
>>Lois, I disagree with you. The CofC does not "try to
>>be all things to all people." My take is that the CofC
>>has a definite personality that it chooses to show
>>only to its favored few. That is the reality. To every
>>other group in the world, it pretends to be
>>what that group is looking for in order to exploit
>>that group's manpower, financial resources, and
>>reputation.
>>
>>That is why my former spiritual counselor said that no
>>one should publicize the fact that one is "looking for
>>a spouse." If one does, some member of the opposite
>>sex who needs something that one has will make him or
>>herself appear to be a reasonable example of what one
>>is looking for -- long enough to get what he or she
>>wants.
>>
>>The NCC has been fooled. And the CofC got what it
>>wanted. Of course, some of its leaders may have
>>pretended to be fooled so as to save face later.
>>
>>And of course, I read the letter to the editor in the
>>"Herald" in which a former LDS wrote that her family
>>found the CofC a "breath of fresh air, after the
>>authoritarian" oppression "of the LDS Church." I
>>thought to myself, "Little does she know...."
>>
>>George
>
>George,
>
>Yes, actually I know that you are right. For the time
>being they "tolerate" all viewpoints. But they are
>working toward corrupting all segments of the church.
>The National Conferences are only the first step.
>Obama and Hillary Clinton are already trying to tie
>foreign aid to the homosexual agenda. Besides that, as
>one cofc leader already acknowledged, if a homosexual
>is ordained in a part of the church that accepts it,
>its ordination will be acknowledged for the whole
>church, Africa, Asia, Central and South America. One
>step at a time in their way.
>
>Lois

I know, Lois. They are demonically clever. When a constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage was proposed, its opponents said that it was not necessary -- the individual states could decide for themselves whether they wanted to have same-sex marriage or not.

Wrong! Only an amendment could have banned it. Since the Constitution states that each state must give full faith and credit to contracts and covenants authorized and executed in other states, all that is necessary is for one state to vote for same sex marriage, and then the activists will go to court to force all the other states to do their bidding. This was the intention from the get go.

Most of the cases taken to court to overturn existing laws to make same sex marriage possible were staged. They were not real cases. For instance, since almost no one has sex in public, sodomy arrests were almost nonexistent. However, in order to get the sodomy laws reviewed by the Supreme Court, some homosexuals did the following:

1. A "partnered" homosexual brought home a partner outside the "partnership," and began having sex with him in the apartment.

2. The other "partner" went and called the police and reported that an armed man had broken into the apartment.

3. The police came, and since the two engaged in sodomy made no effort to hide from the police, they were arrested and charged.

The partner who called in the false report was also arrested for filing a false report. Imagine that! He was convicted, and the conviction was not overturned. And having the police looking for a dangerous, armed suspect, could have resulted in mayhem and death. But the risk of violence and bloodshed was considered worth it to legitimatize sodomy. After all, if one of the conspirators had accidentally been killed, they'd have become instant martyrs.

Ask the lady who was the plaintiff in Roe v. Wade. She was recruited to create a "test case" against abortion. She now repudiates her claim that she was raped, and is now a strong opponent of foeticide.

When the time is ripe, the homosexuals will go to court, along with homophiliacs such as the CofC leadership, and they will persuade the Supreme Court to declare by fiat that same sex marriage is the law of the land. You see, none of these groups believes in common consent, although they talk about it a lot.

The skulduggery involved in getting the RLDS church into the NCC went very much like that, too. The church was reassured that the leaders had absolutely no intention of taking the church into the NCC. And look what happened.

Politicians are not to be trueted, especially when they are masquerading as men of the cloth.

George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Which one is the real one? Look -- Lois, 21:25:57 02/14/12 Tue
- Re: Which one is the real one? Look -- George, 23:54:12 02/14/12 Tue