Re: Which one is the real one? Look -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:25:57 02/14/12 Tue
Author: Lois
Subject: Re: Which one is the real one? Look
In reply to: George 's message, "Re: Which one is the real one? Look" on 19:24:08 02/14/12 Tue

>>>>The Community of Christ, as I have
>>>>endeavored to point out in this thread, tries to be
>>>>all things to all people. That is the reason that
>>they
>>>>will be having National Conferences in the USA,
>>>>Canada, and Australia/New Zealand in order to get
>>>>homosexuality officially in place in "parts" of the
>>>>church. They believe that Christians can operate at
>>>>any moral level. Wrong!
>>>>
>>>>If you want to see the fracture in the Community of
>>>>Christ, which they are so intent in trying to hide
>>>>check out these two Facebook groups.
>>>>------------
>>>>
>>>>Community of Christ
>>>>Church/Religious Organization � Independence,
>>Missouri
>>>>
>>>>https://www.facebook.com/CommunityofChrist.RLDSChurc
>h
>>>>
>>>>This is the official Facebook page in which they try
>>>>keep everything squeaky clean and sweet.
>>>>----------
>>>>
>>>>Community of Christ (open group)
>>>>
>>>> >>>>href="http://www.facebook.com/groups/2205071906/">ht
>t
>>p
>>>:
>>>>//www.facebook.com/groups/2205071906/
>>>>
>>>>This is the unofficial Facebook page on which
>>>>homosexuals, atheists, and agnostics reign supreme.
>>>>
>>>>Jesus spoke of white-washed sepulchers.
>>>>---------------
>>>>
>>>>Submitted by Lois
>>>
>>>Lois, I disagree with you. The CofC does not "try to
>>>be all things to all people." My take is that the
>CofC
>>>has a definite personality that it chooses to show
>>>only to its favored few. That is the reality. To
>every
>>>other group in the world, it pretends to be
>>>what that group is looking for in order to exploit
>>>that group's manpower, financial resources, and
>>>reputation.
>>>
>>>That is why my former spiritual counselor said that
>no
>>>one should publicize the fact that one is "looking
>for
>>>a spouse." If one does, some member of the opposite
>>>sex who needs something that one has will make him or
>>>herself appear to be a reasonable example of what one
>>>is looking for -- long enough to get what he or she
>>>wants.
>>>
>>>The NCC has been fooled. And the CofC got what it
>>>wanted. Of course, some of its leaders may have
>>>pretended to be fooled so as to save face later.
>>>
>>>And of course, I read the letter to the editor in the
>>>"Herald" in which a former LDS wrote that her family
>>>found the CofC a "breath of fresh air, after the
>>>authoritarian" oppression "of the LDS Church." I
>>>thought to myself, "Little does she know...."
>>>
>>>George
>>
>>George,
>>
>>Yes, actually I know that you are right. For the time
>>being they "tolerate" all viewpoints. But they are
>>working toward corrupting all segments of the church.
>>The National Conferences are only the first step.
>>Obama and Hillary Clinton are already trying to tie
>>foreign aid to the homosexual agenda. Besides that, as
>>one cofc leader already acknowledged, if a homosexual
>>is ordained in a part of the church that accepts it,
>>its ordination will be acknowledged for the whole
>>church, Africa, Asia, Central and South America. One
>>step at a time in their way.
>>
>>Lois
>
>I know, Lois. They are demonically clever. When a
>constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage was
>proposed, its opponents said that it was not necessary
>-- the individual states could decide for themselves
>whether they wanted to have same-sex marriage or not.
>
>Wrong! Only an amendment could have banned it. Since
>the Constitution states that each state must give full
>faith and credit to contracts and covenants authorized
>and executed in other states, all that is necessary is
>for one state to vote for same sex marriage, and then
>the activists will go to court to force all the other
>states to do their bidding. This was the intention
>from the get go.
>
>Most of the cases taken to court to overturn existing
>laws to make same sex marriage possible were staged.
>They were not real cases. For instance, since almost
>no one has sex in public, sodomy arrests were almost
>nonexistent. However, in order to get the sodomy laws
>reviewed by the Supreme Court, some homosexuals did
>the following:
>
>1. A "partnered" homosexual brought home a partner
>outside the "partnership," and began having sex with
>him in the apartment.
>
>2. The other "partner" went and called the police and
>reported that an armed man had broken into the
>apartment.
>
>3. The police came, and since the two engaged in
>sodomy made no effort to hide from the police, they
>were arrested and charged.
>
>The partner who called in the false report was also
>arrested for filing a false report. Imagine that! He
>was convicted, and the conviction was not overturned.
>And having the police looking for a dangerous, armed
>suspect, could have resulted in mayhem and death. But
>the risk of violence and bloodshed was considered
>worth it to legitimatize sodomy. After all, if one of
>the conspirators had accidentally been killed, they'd
>have become instant martyrs.
>
>Ask the lady who was the plaintiff in Roe v. Wade. She
>was recruited to create a "test case" against
>abortion. She now repudiates her claim that she was
>raped, and is now a strong opponent of foeticide.
>
>When the time is ripe, the homosexuals will go to
>court, along with homophiliacs such as the CofC
>leadership, and they will persuade the Supreme Court
>to declare by fiat that same sex marriage is the law
>of the land. You see, none of these groups believes in
>common consent, although they talk about it a lot.
>
>The skulduggery involved in getting the RLDS church
>into the NCC went very much like that, too. The
>church was reassured that the leaders had absolutely
>no intention of taking the church into the NCC. And
>look what happened.
>
>Politicians are not to be trueted, especially when
>they are masquerading as men of the cloth.
>
>George

I live in Washington State, now the seventh to make same sex marriage legal. Supposedly the bill excepted churches. How long do you suppose it will take before some same gender couple looks at the prettiest church building in town and demands to have their "wedding" in it? Cake makers, dress makers, anyone that makes their living from weddings, is not except. Does it sound like the sign of the beast to you?

Lois

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Which one is the real one? Look -- George, 23:54:12 02/14/12 Tue