VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]5678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:59:54 08/20/01 Mon
Author: Islandgirl
Subject: When do you think Mulder. . .?

was permanently written off as a nutcase by the vast majority of the F.B.I. hierarchy?? I recently rewatched "Pusher" and was pleasantly surprised to see how well the other agents accepted his suggestions and leadership. Agent Frank Burst — an older agent who seemed to be the head of a division or something — came to Mulder and Scully for help and, although he was a *little* sceptical of some of Mulder's theories, he basically went with Mulder's scenario for trapping Pusher; this was in season three. Later, in season five, when Pusher escapted in "Kitsungari", Mulder was given full credit as being "the agent who originally put him behind bars" and was made the Special Agent in Charge of the hunt to recapture him.
By late season five/early season six, however, Mulder (Scully, too, but to a lesser extent) seemed to pretty much be a bureau pariah and was constantly having to justify his work, the existance of the X-Files, etc. Of course, from the very beginning it was apparent that the higher-ups were, at best, ambivalent at about Mulder; he was regarded as a brilliant criminal profiler but was also tagged "Spooky" for his unusual beliefs in aliens and the paranormal. At what point do you think they decided he was more of a liablity than an asset and why??

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.