When I showed forth my point -- FawnDoo's Cavalcade of Whimsy

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:31:31 04/11/03 Fri
Author: WarCore
Subject: When I showed forth my point
In reply to: Goktimus Prime 's message, "gay love" on 09:48:41 04/09/03 Wed

...i was pointing out that the love spoken of in the bible, the agapao love the love of God is not one that is normally in humanity. sorry, but its a fact. this is a love that is completely self-less. i never said homosexuality was normal and that compassion and charity aren't. nor would i equate God's Love to an intense emotional attachment or to mere charity.

the Bible speaks of God letting his son die for his enemies...what person in humanity would do that?

Is this to be another topic that facts are ignored to support the argument?

A) The fact that homosexual intercourse does not result in procreation hints at a few things. It says that (if you believe in evolution that is) that the process of passing this gene is not grounded in science, but in the emotional state. If all people were homosexuals could it be the end of the species?(don't bother answering this, its rhetorical). Ergo, homosexuals can't reproduce, so the action in itself is contrary to the natural progression of procreation--its unnatural. Don't ignore the fact of the impossibility of homosexual reproduction and the progression of genetic information by pointing out the bollocks of fellatio. Homosexuality in all its activities will never result in procreation and Heterosexuality in all its activities can result in procreation. Scientifically this is a reason why Christians may consider homosexual love-making to be wrong. Taking it a step further to the Biblical account of creation, homosexuality goes against the order that was set up in the Bible of Man and Woman, thus being unnatural to the order. Theologically, another reason why Christian's consider homosexual love-making to be wrong.

B)According to the Bible Sodom and Gamorah enforced it's pride by not repenting of the sin they were commiting. The God of the Bible destroyed them. Historically this is a reason why Christians consider homosexual love-making to be wrong.

C)According to the Bible in the letter to the Romans Paul refers to homosexuality as God giving man over to a reprobate man. Almost as if that has become the ultimate perversion of the thoughts of man. Harmotologically this then becomes a reason why Christians consider homosexual love-making to be wrong.

D) According to the Mosaic Covenant, homosexual love-making was considered a breach of the covenant...in both the love-making form and the form of practices of other religions. Christians, not being part of the old covenant, have affirmation in the Epistles the order of this heavenly priesthood was to be that of man and woman. Leviticallly, this is a reason why Christian's consider homosexual love-making to be wrong.

You will have no compelling reason to convince you. I'm sorry. If you honestly wish to look at it from the Christian perspective to see why they consider it wrong I would suggest reading the Bible. Other than that, this is a contentious subject of which I'm sure much "bollocks" tossing will abound.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

And? -- Goktimus Prime, 09:29:24 04/12/03 Sat
- Logic and religion -- Perceptor II, 21:45:13 04/12/03 Sat
  - declaring reason -- Goktimus Prime, 02:36:08 04/13/03 Sun
    - Perceptor has a point. -- WarCore, 03:35:07 04/13/03 Sun
    - My ONLY commentary on this thread -- Icon, 13:53:38 04/15/03 Tue