VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:17:36 07/09/01 Mon
Author: Ron H, Glory
Subject: Re: New changes for FWL ?
In reply to: Paul J 's message, "New changes for FWL ?" on 14:32:32 07/06/01 Fri

I, of course, am very favorable to this idea. Although, Marco makes some good points, the reason someone should be a GM is so that they can be challenged on many levels. I know that I enjoy the draft and training camp more than anything else. What these rules do is force you to truly be a GM.

What I would REALLY like is to have every team submit 2 players that they want to "protect", anybody else is game to be a holdout. These would be players that demand a trade and MUST get it or not play. As someone mentioned in this thread, particularly vulnerable would be 3+ year players who are riding the bench with good attribute scores. They, and their agents, would simply not tolerate it.

Challenge the GMs and see how they respond!

Ron


>
>Yes theyre controversial but very realistic. In the
>FWL you get dynasties, eg Austria and if they avoid
>retirements they will always win. It'll make the
>league boring and stale. Doing this causes teams to
>have a few upsets some years and also generate
>trading, eg the trading of holdouts etc.
>
>I think theyre a good idea ?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • Re: New changes for FWL ? -- Miguel, 19:37:22 07/11/01 Wed
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT+0
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.