Author:
teltalheart/moderator
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 21:36:16 07/19/08 Sat
Author Host/IP: 67-72-98-45.propel.com/67.72.98.45
Post 218 A: Scandalum Magnatum
This English Law, The Statute of Westminster of 1275 A.D., provided that "from henceforth none be so hardy to tell or publish any false News or Tales, whereby discord, or occasion of discord or slander may grow between the King and his People, or the Great Men of the Realm." It was both a tort and a criminal offence. Peers could recover damages in civil trials without proving any harm to their reputation. Punishment in criminal trials was often arbitrary. They usually consisted of minor fines and short jail sentences of one month, give or take. Scandalum Magnatum was repealed in 1887 by the Statute Law Revision Act.
The point around which all this turns is the segment "false News or Tales." How does one know if a "Tale" is false if one is not provided with evidence, for or against?
Who rules? Who has the right to rule? Where is the evidence of such right?
The Bible? Is the Bible the evidence of such right? Does the Bible tell us who is to rule?
The old Testament is a book of tales and stories which follows a certain genealogical line. But, which line, where is the evidence, where is the D.N.A. evidence? Many of the tales are falsehoods and fiction; 'God created the world in seven days,' and such. Some of it appears to be the effort of people, barely out of the stoneage, to interpret things of a technical nature which they obviously could not explain.
The line in question seems to come out of the northern Iran, Caucasus Mountain region. From there, in the tales of Adam and Eve, it travels south to the city state of Ur in old Mesopotamia, with the tales of Abraham.
With Abraham the line goes into exile from Mesopotamia and travels to Canaan. From Canaan the line goes to Egypt with Joseph of the coat of many colors, son of Jacob, grandson of Isaac, great grandson of Abraham. The grandson of Joseph is believed by many to be the Egyptian Pharaoh Akhenaten, son of Pharaoh Amenhotep III and Tiye, daughter of Joseph/Yuya and Thuya.
This line from Akhenaten is also believed to be the line that descends down to King Saul and King David. From there the line descends down to Joseph and Jesus as well as James, Joses, Simon, and Judas, as well as the sisters of Jesus; Mary, Salome and Joanna.
So what of the ossuary (bone box) of the Lost Tomb of Jesus, recently discovered? They were D.N.A. test for mitochondria. Then they were hurriedly reburied in a secret location by the Jews, once they finally realized what they had.
Did you know it's illegal to do a D.N.A. test on an Egyptian Pharaoh's mummy?
It's also illegal to do a D.N.A. test on a member of the Royal Family of England. Maybe it would show the paternal line of the Royal House of England is from Riccio the fiddle player, (Piedmontese secretary - David Riccio), and lover of Mary Queen of Scots, and not Lord Darnley. Perhaps it would show the world the paternity of Prince Harry is from the stable hand and not Prince Charles. Perhaps it would show that the Royal Family is not the Royal Family. How can anything be determined if no evidence is allowed?
I would be more than happy to supply a sample of my D.N.A. for testing.
If everything is on the up-and-up, why all the secrecy?
'As a sinner I am truly conscious of having often offended my Creator and I beg him to forgive me, but as a Sovereign, I am aware of no fault or offence for which I have to render account to anyone here below.'
'Without Law there can be no freedom. Without justice there can be no Law.'
End Post 218 A: www.voy.com/40560/ teltalheart
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
|
Feedback: 
Post 218 A: Scandalum Magnatum