Re: Wills - you and your lies are a joke -- Manly Haters Page

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:30:25 12/26/01 Wed
Author: Nugget
Subject: Re: Wills - you and your lies are a joke
In reply to: Wills 's message, "Wills - you and your lies are a joke" on 20:51:00 12/24/01 Mon

C'mon! you both support evil clubs whose deeds have both been in the worst interest of Rugby League. Yet my club is also in the same boat. With Penrith jumping on the SL band wagon they alienated their fans who voted against SL. Manly tried to buy premierships !.. and failed. Peter Moore turned his back on his best mate and Canterbury's passionate fans. you are both in the same boat

>You bother with me because I won't cop your inane
>prattle without response - which then forces you to
>attempt to recover by responding, generally with
>name-calling rather than addressing my comments.
>
>You should seriously hope that I never decide to
>take-on some of your typically inane posts at
>oneeyedeagle.
>
>(1) I have only ever put forward MY opinion as to why
>I favoured SL - I have NEVER posted anything
>purporting it to be Canterbury's position. Still,
>don't let the facts get in your way, Col.
>
>(2) Canterbury were not an impoverished Club pre-SL.
>You may recall that they (along with Parra...
>possibly) were the most successful Club of the '80's
>on-field. Had you taken time to look, you would also
>have noted that their League Club has been a
>financially successful business since the mid-'70's
>and has underpinned the Football Club over the years
>(League Club and Football Club are mutually inclusive
>in monetary terms, be it St.George, Penrith, Easts or
>Canterbury).
>
>Still, don't let the facts bother you.
>
>(3) The pre-SL administration were bent on a
>willy-nilly expansionist strategy that burned millions
>by placing teams in Adelaide, Perth etc and managed to
>completely overlook Melbourne. Can we credit Arko with
>this? The Melbourne Metro area had a NSW/QLD expat
>population circa 70K and growing in 1989. How many
>times have we seen a business fail by attempting to
>grow too quickly AND with a mis-begotten 'strategy'?
>
>The demise of the Clubs to which you refer resulted
>from a chain of events set in motion by the ARL.
>
>(4) Never have I criticised you, or anyone, for being
>a fan of other sports / codes. However,with apologies
>to Shakespeare; you come to bury RL, not to praise it.
>And you do it consistently. It's not that I feel the
>Code should be considered a sacred cow or above
>criticism - but the destructive sniping you constantly
>spew forth is another matter.
>
>Have yourself a nice little Christmas.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Wills - you and your opinion are praiseworthy. -- Wills, 19:12:40 12/27/01 Thu
- Wills, one out of 3 ain't bad -- CB, 23:13:22 12/27/01 Thu