Re: Home For Aged Footballers -- fantasy.footy

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:14:39 02/13/02 Wed
Author: Paul Williams
Subject: Re: Home For Aged Footballers
In reply to: Phil 's message, "Home For Aged Footballers" on 17:21:33 02/11/02 Mon

>This presumably explains why the average age of the side that shouldn't have got beat on Sunday was 27, which is about the same as most premier league teams.

As to the 'past-it' player philosophy, it didn't do us any harm with the likes of Gough and Gascoigne, and Ginola was the only one who looked like scoring on Sunday. And for every 'oldie', there's also the likes of Linderoth, Caesley and Blomqvist.

I agree about selling the kids. I guess we could start playing Wayne Rooney now, let him score a few goals, and then sell him for a few mill on his 17th birthday ! In retrospect, however, selling Jeffers, ball and Barbmy looks like good business. How many games have the three of them played in total ?!

AAnyway, let's not wash our dirty laundry in public - there may be some Kopites accessing this Message Board who have found somebody to read it out to them !!!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[>

Re: Home For Aged Footballers -- JB, 10:55:43 02/13/02 Wed

Ball, Jeffers and now Gravesen didn't WANT to play for the team so good riddance. 8-10m for Jeffers looks like good money considering he spends more time on the treatment table than on the pitch. As for Dunne - did you really think he was a good player? Jevons has some promise but if was going to be a star then surely a Premiership team would have bought him. McCann has had all his best games for Sunderland not for EFC. As for first division football next season I think it's just a little soon to be playing the death march. Walters biggest failing is in his tactical knowledge of the game. Playing Blomqvist on the right just doesn't make sense to me. The thing we really need is a fit mobile centre forward ( with pace )who can feed of the quality crosses that Ginola and Blomqvist can supply and who can be purchased for a half eaten bag of toffees....

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Home For Aged Footballers -- Phil, 08:47:12 02/14/02 Thu

Fair play to you both, lads. Some good points well made.

What really gets me down, putting Walter's bizarre tactics and teams selections to one side for a minute, is that in 30 years of going to the match I can not recollect so many players expressing their desire to leave Goodison. Coincidence? Not likely.

We have a reserve team who won their Premier league title last year, mainly by using the kids given the level of injuries we had to 'senior' players, and how many of those have been given their chance? Admittedly Hibbert has played a few games lately, Clarke a couple and Chadwick has had the odd 20 minutes.

We just seem to be playing for today and not building for the future, perhaps partly down to fincancial constraints but surely not totally down to it.

Anyway, I think I have whinged enough and feel a bit better now. I'm off for a lie down.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]