VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:16:17 11/25/00 Sat
Author: 馮志弘
Subject: 作品優劣見仁見智?
In reply to: 歐丹玲 's message, "小小回應,多多包涵" on 19:06:10 11/25/00 Sat

  同學討論到評論的標準,也許可以補充以下資料,以資參考。

  一些文學評論家認為不同的人群(groups)會有他們不同「解釋策略」。例如,在中國,詩騷李杜等已被認為是不朽的作品。因此,當閱讀這些作品時,「偉大」已不再是閱讀的「結論」而是閱讀的「前題。舉一個非常極端的反例:如果一隻猩猩「閱讀」這些作品的時候,牠就肯定不會先有這個閱讀前題了。

  因此,說文學沒有絕對客觀標準,大致是沒有問題的;只是我們應該還有一個「相對客觀標準」。例如在現代文學中,一般認為,張愛玲已上升至「經典」地位,而趙樹理則「見仁見智」了。

  我們把這種「相對客觀標準」稱為該種人群的「解釋共同體」(interpretive community)。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.