自相矛盾 -- 人生無題

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Fri April 04, 2003 12:42:31
Author: sum2k
Subject: 自相矛盾
In reply to: 22:08 's message, "石頭問題有問題嗎？" on Thu April 03, 2003 21:16:06

有人說他賣的矛是全世界最尖，可擊玻任何野。
他又有賣盾，他也說那盾是全世界最硬既野，冇任可野可以擊破佢。

這是「自相矛盾」的由來。
很logic 地，世界上沒有無堅不破的矛，亦沒有無懈可擊的盾，賣這兩野東西的人，明顯地犯了嚴重的錯。

有人說他信的神是全能的，無野造不出來。
他又說他的神是全能的，無事係辦不到的。

很logic 地，說這說話的人明顯地犯了嚴重的錯。

如果羅輯是神造出來，為何神自己又不合這個羅輯呢﹖
假使神是全能，為甚麼我們又能用簡單的問題去驗證神的能力不是聖經所說全能呢﹖

看來，神既不合科學
亦不合羅輯，神的存在，到底為甚麼呢﹖

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

修改定義 -- 00:24, Fri April 04, 2003 23:29:01
- 執一而廢百 -- 淇少俠, Sat April 05, 2003 09:05:10
  - Re: 神，必全能。 -- 小朱屎屎, Mon April 07, 2003 00:51:07
    - 「全能」是甚麼意思呢？ -- 01:03, Mon April 07, 2003 01:09:54
      - Re: 「全能」是甚麼意思呢？ -- 小朱屎屎, Mon April 07, 2003 01:17:41
        Re: 「全能」是甚麼意思呢？ -- wai, Mon April 07, 2003 14:53:06
        不是試探 -- 00:58, Tue April 08, 2003 01:16:10
        Re: 我對邏輯的看法 -- 小朱屎屎, Tue April 08, 2003 03:23:55
        火車軌上是自由？ -- 03:56, Tue April 08, 2003 04:10:30
        Re: 不是試探 -- 楊婉婷, Tue July 05, 2005 01:30:40
Re: 上帝與石頭不可「證明」神是「不全能」 -- 小朱屎屎, Mon April 07, 2003 01:14:13
- 似乎不對 -- 15:31, Mon April 07, 2003 15:59:39
- 以全能否定石頭問題? -- 淇少俠, Mon April 07, 2003 21:08:18
  - Re: 提出的同時，假設應已存在。 -- 小朱屎屎, Tue April 08, 2003 02:58:20
    - Re: 提出的同時，假設應已存在。 -- 05:17, Tue April 08, 2003 05:28:13
      - 更正 -- 05:25, Tue April 08, 2003 05:29:57
      - 神並非全能 -- 淇少俠, Thu April 17, 2003 01:36:32
      - Re: 提出的同時，假設應已存在。 -- 楊婉婷, Tue July 05, 2005 01:44:48
- Re: 上帝與石頭不可「證明」神是「不全能」 -- NOk, Tue April 15, 2003 23:41:44
  - 不大明白 -- 淇少俠, Thu April 17, 2003 01:38:46
    - Re: 不大明白 -- re, Fri April 18, 2003 01:35:31
      - 明白了~~ -- 淇少俠, Fri May 02, 2003 18:56:40
Re: 自相矛盾.........神是不是全能與能不能搬起這個石頭無關 -- 沉思者, Fri May 23, 2003 17:00:51
- 循環論證呀大佬 -- 01:59, Sat June 07, 2003 02:06:56