VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]7 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:20:53 11/28/02 Thu
Author: Lee
Subject: Doing some ranting of my own…
In reply to: - 's message, "season eight: When the Bough Breaks, November 19, 2002" on 00:53:14 11/23/02 Sat

You know I just spent a better part of a half-hour to forty-five minutes clearing out my inbox. ALL the post was woman trashing Harm for not ‘confiding’ in Mac about his suspicions. Of course the bashing went from him being a complete insensitive jerk, to being a complete ego maniac. Oh did I forget to mention? Harm acts like Peter Pan and will never go up by some woman.

I’m starting to really understand why Kip dislikes Shippers sometimes

What is all the fuss about anyway?

Watch the scene in the transport again. Mute the sound and actually LOOK at Harm’s body language. If that’s NOT the body language of a man doing some serious flirting I don’t know what is.

I liked the episode. This episode was A LOT better than say Adrift II or Dog robbers.

Has it occurred to anyone that Harm has NO proof of anything? I’ve read SO many e-mails trashing Harm for NOT telling Mac his suspicions. Here’s the question I’m throwing out? What if Hard did tell Mac about his suspicions, and that caused her to skew the investigation, and later Harm’s suspicions later proved to be wrong? Mac would have ended up with egg all over her face and possibly a written reprimand as fired up as AJ was over this case.

I think Harm did the right thing not telling Mac and letting her walk in to this investigation IMPARTIAL and ignorant of his suspicions. That way Mac could eliminate (or add) suspects with out any personal bias/opinions getting in her way. I think that’s the very reason that Harm called in Manotti (spelling). She’s new, has never met Singer in person and would NOT be carrying any personal bias in to her investigation. Hell, Manotti had NO idea what she was supposed to be looking for.

As for the whole Singer baby thing…. I’m betting Harriet’s going to be the one to convince Singer to keep the baby and I’m betting Harriet and Bud is going to adopt it. I don’t see a Harm/Singer marriage in the works anytime soon.

If Harm wants to be a large part of his niece/nephews life. IMHO God bless him! We NEED more men like him in this world. Speaking from personal experience with my mom’s dad…It takes a VERY special kind of man with a very generous giving spirit to help raise a child that isn’t his.

As Mac could testify sometimes an uncle CAN make all the difference to a child.

Lee

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-4
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.