VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:08:09 05/06/09 Wed
Author: Tina L
Subject: Re: Akiva and the Really cold hard facts
In reply to: Julie B 's message, "Re: Akiva and the Really cold hard facts" on 17:49:18 05/06/09 Wed

There have been some really good points stated here,and I agree any breeder can have a bad dog pop up. But the bottom line is this. When the dog showed signs of the problem the breeder should have been contacted regardless. If you want help or for them to make it right you need to inform them and not after the fact.

I feel for Jess and Ed as it's not easy losing a pet. But it seems John was never given the chance to corret the problem whether the dog had bad nerves or not.

Tina L

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.