privacy in the empire -- Left-Wing Discussion

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed 2003-10-22 06:33:35
Author: sweetheart
Subject: privacy in the empire
In reply to: Redeye 's message, "Not the Patriot Act Democratic wing of the Republicratic party (remember: the differences between the D's and the R's are largely in management and in detail rather than in principle)" on Wed 2003-10-22 02:53:47

I have avoided politics entirely prior to the 2000 coup, as i have a intense distaste for the democrats, and was a registered republican until just recently, having now sent in my voter registration as democrat so i can vote kucinich as a statement of intent.

I saw during the dotcom heydey's in 2000 a tremendous boom in american imperialism in london all backed by enormous money in bubble markets out there bankrupting any local business innovation in europe by sheer competetive capitalization bullying.... that was nauseating to see and the democrats were all for it... the democrats are really no better and i really can't stand them either... just voting green is no real contribution... and were my real poltical voice embodied in a party, green would likely be the only capable of echoing it... in britain the liberal democrats (though they have dropped their intelligent views on legalizing cannabis to woo more voters from the conservatives... i hope it costs them votes and seats... asswipes... the scottish socialist party is succeeding largely and i believe solely due to this).

I am against political parties all together... they are like organized religion taking on a life of their own as if an organization actually represents individual private life in any way at all... and truly, i fault the finance/media axis as root to this conspiracy. As nobody votes for it, it is deemed acceptable status quo... all the while rotting out any sincerity and quality intelligence left in the public common.

I've had my share of censorship on the web (not suprisingly for suggesting that accenture is as legally responsible for the behavior of arthur andersen as they were the same company during the period of the crimes)... and for attacking reuters hidden monopoly... i don't think most of the public realizes that the world financial markets have 1 real-time digital newspapaer... and that is presumed to be unbiased... ha. The entire dot com bubble points to the failure in financial news media to get to the truth, but that empire is left intact, as it is really a military disinformation network preferred as a private business... all around the anglo-settler graft-corruption party that includes democrats, republicans, tories, CDU, and a whole gamut of world corporatists who see serious social evolution as a threat to their customer's buying habits... best they are stupid and ill informed that advertising works better to keep them addicted to being consumption cattle in the feed-lot USA.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: privacy in the empire -- Redeye, Wed 2003-10-22 10:29:16
- Re: privacy in the empire -- sweetheart, Wed 2003-10-22 11:07:23
  - Re: privacy in the empire -- Redeye, Fri 2003-10-24 08:00:58
    - unfettered capitalism -- sweetheart, Sat 2003-10-25 11:49:11
      - Re: unfettered capitalism -- Redeye, Sun 2003-10-26 04:53:54