insinuations - the JA way -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 26/11/09 9:20:50pm
Author: Peter Eveleigh
Subject: insinuations - the JA way
In reply to: nelly 's message, "Re: 2000 apologise?" on 26/11/09 8:37:55pm

>Sarah - what kind of accusation are you making towards
>Peter - that he wanted to marry someone who was old
>enough to marry and make their own mind up.... but
>what you are really implying is something more
>sinister. You have no right to do that and should
>really shut up. Out here in grown up land we disagree
>with one another without having to resort to stuff
>like that.
>
>

Thanks nelly.
You hit it on the head. It was the nasty insinuations that made innocent things so nasty. Sarah knows that because when she was being the nice, reasonable "trust me, nobody controls me" Sarah, I told her how I had felt about the whole business. She knows for instance that I was a normal hot-blooded twenty year old and the girl was 18 and that I had no intention of marrying anybody at all. I just wanted a normal relationship....and got treated like shit for it.

But what she also knows is that I didn't leave for another 9 months and it was not that relationship which made me leave, because I accepted the discipline of the church and tried very hard indeed to believe that their decisions for me were right, because I wanted to be wrong so that I would be accepted.....a little like the bit of self-deceit Sarah is engaged in now, herself.....because unless she is planning on leaving her husband and children and the church she has submitted to for 36 years, she has no alternative but to do as she has been told and trash me.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: insinuations - the JA way -- Same Old Story, 27/11/09 7:58:57am
- Re: insinuations - the JA way -- John Smith, 27/11/09 9:39:18am
  - the cutest irony -- Peter Eveleigh, 27/11/09 4:27:18pm
    - Re: the cutest irony -- Sarah Hughes, 27/11/09 11:25:50pm
      - equal moderation would have meant a shared responsibility -- Peter Eveleigh, 28/11/09 12:19:48am
        Stockholm syndrome -- Peter Eveleigh, 28/11/09 12:37:56am
        Re: Stockholm syndrome -- Peter Eveleigh, 28/11/09 12:46:05am
        Re: Stockholm syndrome -- Sarah Hughes, 1/12/09 4:18:55pm
  - Re: insinuations - the JA way -- Sarah Hughes, 27/11/09 8:22:26pm
    - the JA way -- Peter Eveleigh, 29/11/09 12:59:09pm
The JA way is like the Jesuit way -- Barbara, 4/12/09 2:00:04pm

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>Sarah - what kind of accusation are you making towards >>Peter - that he wanted to marry someone who was old >>enough to marry and make their own mind up.... but >>what you are really implying is something more >>sinister. You have no right to do that and should >>really shut up. Out here in grown up land we disagree >>with one another without having to resort to stuff >>like that. >> >> > >Thanks nelly. >You hit it on the head. It was the nasty insinuations >that made innocent things so nasty. Sarah knows that >because when she was being the nice, reasonable "trust >me, nobody controls me" Sarah, I told her how I had >felt about the whole business. She knows for instance >that I was a normal hot-blooded twenty year old and >the girl was 18 and that I had no intention of >marrying anybody at all. I just wanted a normal >relationship....and got treated like shit for it. > >But what she also knows is that I didn't leave for >another 9 months and it was not that relationship >which made me leave, because I accepted the discipline >of the church and tried very hard indeed to believe >that their decisions for me were right, because I >wanted to be wrong so that I would be accepted.....a >little like the bit of self-deceit Sarah is engaged in >now, herself.....because unless she is planning on >leaving her husband and children and the church she >has submitted to for 36 years, she has no alternative >but to do as she has been told and trash me.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.