VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Thursday, November 21, 08:38:03am [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Tuesday, November 19, 03:36:56pm
Author: Same Old Story
Author Host/IP: NoHost / 90.241.124.131
Subject: Comparing the revenue we got in the respective years vs revenue premier league club generated, both from a commercial (sponsorship etc) and broadcast point of view. You could argue as low as £500m, but thats not my point - our problem is we dropped to a third of our revenue in those times, but didn't drop our costs anywhere near the same proportion. Its an oversimplified view, of course, with much more nuance than this forum allows, but the fundamental point remains the same.
In reply to: Henry1879 's message, "How have you reached the 700m figure for not being in the top division during their tenure?" on Tuesday, November 19, 02:27:30pm


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • Further 'actuals' inside - in reality probably somewhere between £500m and £600m -- Same Old Story, Tuesday, November 19, 04:18:09pm (NoHost/90.241.124.131)
  • This is recommendable as worth clicking on. It differs from the musings of the shape-shifter addressing you above in aiming to deal in objective data rather than fancies. That's so at least until your final forecast, made in shared ignorance of how long it will be before they sell up. That said, you're likely right and certainly are earlier in this thread on the theme of flats-on-CC. (NT) -- b+w g., Tuesday, November 19, 05:49:31pm (host109-154-238-80.range109-154.btcentralplus.com/109.154.238.80)
    [ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
    Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
     * HTML allowed in marked fields.
    Message subject (required):

    Name (required):

      Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

      E-mail address (optional):

    Type your message here:

    Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

    Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT+0
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.