Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Glad you brought this up! Author: Go Green [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 13:02:59 02/02/26 Mon In reply to: Grin and Bear it 's message, "Missed Foul Shots..." on 12:55:49 02/02/26 Mon Dartmouth went 24-28 from the FT line, with Kareem Thomas (who shot poorly from the field) going 10-10. Given that the game went into OT, we needed every one of those free throws. While I haven't seen Brown play other than the Dartmouth game, it was clear that Brown pressed and played very tight defense against Dartmouth most of the game. That takes energy. Brown's guys may just be gassed enough to miss those FTs by an inch (which is all it takes). [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Re: Missed Foul Shots... Author: Brown Fan [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 16:09:12 02/03/26 Tue The free throw shooting actually has been better this year than last year, but it's still not where it needs to be. On the other hand, opponents have made 73 of 79 foul shots against Brown in the last 3 games. The ineffective outside shooting is what has really hurt Brown this year. Losing AJ Lesburt and Brady Loughlin for the entire Ivy season has been brutal for a team that lost Lilly, Cooley, and Lyndel Erold. That's a huge amount of offense to lose, and the remainder of the squad simply has not been able to pick up the slack. Mike Martin keeps trying different combinations, but so far nothing has led to a victory since the Columbia game.

[> [> Subject: I never understood... Author: Go Green [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 08:05:47 02/04/26 Wed ... why stats regarding "opponents free throws" are kept. https://ivyleague.com/stats.aspx?path=mbball&year=2025 Even assuming that teams are shooting better at the line against a certain team, how exactly is that team supposed to improve its numbers in that regard?

[> [> [> Subject: Re: I never understood... Author: observer [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 09:18:39 02/04/26 Wed Measures 3 things: 1) Luck 2) Shooting background (it seems like the Palestra has a net negative effect, based on initial parsing of data) 3) Relative strength/weakness of program at the line. This thread seems to be proven out - Brown has either run into terrible luck, or relative to their peers, they can't hit FT...

[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: I never understood... Author: An Observer [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 10:14:56 02/04/26 Wed I'm interested whenever opponents' free throw percentage stands out. Following up on observer: (1) Similar to when opponents shoot 60% from behind the three-point arc for a half or even a game, luck matters. But eventually, reversion to the mean occurs. (2) Congratulations to Penn fans, I presume, for screaming and yelling enough to make a difference. I'm surprised that Jadwin doesn't lower opponents' free throw shooting. The "airplane hanger" is certainly the venue that Ivy opponents complain about the most in terms of shooting background. (3) As Go Green suggested, other parts of the game can affect a team's free throw shooting, at least in theory. If you press for 40 minutes, you're going to be tired at the line with five seconds left. Also, some players (and therefore some teams) just seem to be more calm and composed at the line with the game on the line. Maybe it's my imagination, but you can almost see it in a player's face. Can a team (or a crowd) affect an opponent's composure at crunch time? Maybe.

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: I never understood... Author: sparman [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 10:32:37 02/04/26 Wed I can think of a couple possible reasons to compile this infotmation. First, the number of opponent free throws tells you about the effect of your own team fouls. If you are committing excessive shooting fouls or when the opppnent is in a bounus situation as compared to nonshooting fouls, that could be something to identify. Second, the number of points your opponents typically score on FT tells you something about the level of disadvantage you are incurring from shooting fouls. Of course it may just be the simpler explanation of measuring the disruption caused by fans or shooting environment. If that's the case, I would think percentages are increasing as crowds shrink. Or maybe it's even simpler than that - some stat geek who just loves making numbers rrgardless of relevancy.

[> [> [> Subject: The league says that Columbia's Noland is leading the national in FT percentage Author: Go Green [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 16:50:36 02/05/26 Thu Good luck to everyone defending him at the line!