VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456[7]8910 ]
Subject: Re: Harvard 34 Cornell 10


Author:
M3
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 00:26:45 10/11/25 Sat
In reply to: Squeaker 's message, "Harvard 34 Cornell 10" on 23:07:56 10/10/25 Fri

The Harvard fumble that was not called in the 4th quarter ended what was becoming a competitive game

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> Subject: Re: Harvard 34 Cornell 10


Author:
Phil Leotardo
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 01:02:58 10/11/25 Sat

100% believe the shorter ref who was the line of scrimmage spot judge all night was cheating for Harvard. Consistently giving Harvard an extra half yard (at least) on their ball spots. The other ref who did all the talking, however, seemed fair
[> [> Subject: Cornell got jobbed by the refs


Author:
Penn Nation
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:21:19 10/11/25 Sat

Home cooking calls throughout the game.
[> [> [> Subject: Re: Cornell got jobbed by the refs


Author:
sparman
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:36:52 10/11/25 Sat

Announcers made a good point about the effect of bad calls on key plays on Cornell players.
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Cornell got jobbed by the refs


Author:
Joe Friday
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:48:12 10/11/25 Sat

Yes - it was obvious that the C players became totally deflated after the blown fumble/incomplete pass call in the 4th. It is totally unacceptable that the booth didn’t pause play and take a look at it - especially since they had paused play on one or more occasions previously on at least one much less consequential call.
It’s equally unacceptable that the C HC didn’t call timeout to plead his case, give the booth extra time to the right thing, get it right…but he didn’t - he presumed that justice would be done and that presumption was fatal. He failed to act in the moment and use all the tools at his disposal at the clear turning point in the game, and it may have cost them the game - and he knows it. I’m thinking he won’t make that mistake again.
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Cornell got jobbed by the refs


Author:
John Harvard (Timeout)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:56:40 10/11/25 Sat

Surace would have claimed he did call timeout and run on the field regardless.
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Cornell got jobbed by the refs


Author:
Tiger69
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:53:19 10/12/25 Sun

John harvard: Still smartin’ from our win?
[> [> Subject: the single bias in this discussion is seen in folks who'd rather see harvard on the losing end.


Author:
valmas (stoic)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:17:54 10/11/25 Sat

there's far too much hyperbolic nonsense to respond to all at once on this thread. let's just try to understand that the so-called 'spotting official' is the game's umpire and he's NOT cheating or placing the ball at some indiscriminate location to his emotional liking. actually, the wing officials are out there to
define for the umpire where to place the ball, based on their determination of the maximal point of forward progress at the end of a given play.

now, what exactly is forward progress? it's the most forward point toward the opponent's goal line that the ball has reached when the runner's
momentum is stopped by an opponent. there's a lot to unpack about this definition, though it should be clear to even the most
uninitiated that those officials nearest the sidelines at the beginning of a play have forward progress responsibilities as their movements are basically parallel to the field's sidelines; thus they've got the chance to look directly at a play, rather than taking it in from in front of or behind the action.

so, if you're going to complain about the spotting of the ball, at
least make the attempt to figure out who to direct your complaint to. better still, admit that it's more than a bit unhinged to cite 'home cooking' and 'cheating' as realistic factors in ivy league
football contests.

keep in mind, too, that if ever you appear in a court proceeding as a defendant or plaintiff, you're certainly entitled to a fair outcome - though not necessarily a perfect one! similarly, these game officials work to give the kids a fair game and they generally succeed in doing just that.
[> [> [> Subject: Re: the single bias in this discussion is seen in folks who'd rather see harvard on the losing end.


Author:
Squeaker
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:26:08 10/11/25 Sat

I was not paying as close of attention to the play by play spotting of the ball as Phil seems to have been, but I can think of a couple curious spots that were in Harvard's favor. Most notably when the Harvard receiver caught the ball right on the sideline seemingly a full yard short of the first down line, only to be immediately driven backwards by Cornell defenders. Somehow, though, the first down was granted
[> [> [> [> Subject: 'seemingly' being the operative word of your conmentary.


Author:
valmas (stoic)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:36:43 10/11/25 Sat

you write about the runner being immediately driven backwards when that just begs the question: what was the most forward point of the ball - the point of the BALL nearest the opponent's goal line -
in relation to the yard line and nearest sideline when the runner's momentum was stopped by an opponent or he stepped out of
bounds? notice, the rule doesn't
relate to a need to know where the runner's torso was when the play ended and so many of these long-
limbed, skill position players are so very good at extending the ball forward, a yard or more, before
their momentum is stopped and while they're still inbounds. not to mention that these types of plays can explode on the covering referee who needs to come up with several data points of information in an instant: catch/no catch; landing point inbounds/out of bounds; was momentum stopped; did the runner go out-of-bounds and where was the nose of the ball when the play ended?

and if there's any benefit of the doubt to be given, it typically goes to the offensive player doing the heavy lifting on the play: making the catch; establishing inbounds possession of the ball; absorbing contact and still managing to maintain ball control and forward momentum. as each team will go on offense at some point in the game with rules encouraging an equivalency in total number of team possessions, each team's offense stands to reap this same level of benefit; or to create a higher level of benefit for themselves as based on their efforts and presentation.

all this having now been stated, squeaker, is not to discount the worthiness of your assessments. perhaps your view should carry the day, but, again, the game's not perfect - not from the perspective of anyone associated with event. but i remain confident that the day the players come to play mistake-free football, the referees will be on the scene, calling the perfect game, too.
[> [> [> Subject: Re: the single bias in this discussion is seen in folks who'd rather see harvard on the losing end.


Author:
Phil Leotardo
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:27:42 10/11/25 Sat

Yeah, I know what forward progress is. Call it like I see it, one ref in particular giving Harvard generous spots all night.


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.