VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

14/06/26 5:30am [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18/07/21 12:58pm
Author: '51Bewick
Subject: Agree with all of this
In reply to: D9 's message, "Another example why Balance Rules are unrealistic" on 13/07/21 2:04pm

Before someone comes in to say I'm just defending my own position, things have changed over the years, and the Kookaburras now have ample tall coverage.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • The reason we took this out -- GTD, 18/07/21 1:25pm
  • I thought it was ... -- M42, 18/07/21 2:02pm
  • It all comes down to one simple thing -- D9, 18/07/21 10:30pm
  • 2nd GTD -- Maxwell, 19/07/21 2:39pm
  • Mods, Why can't we go case by case?? -- Slade, 20/07/21 12:52am
  • If they have ample depth but choose not to use vs No depth -- John, 20/07/21 7:27pm
    Forum timezone: GMT+11
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.