VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

14/06/26 2:11am [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 1/07/20 8:49pm
Author: Brendan
Subject: Would like to see everyones view on the below 4 questions

Hey Gents,

It's a little tough to summarise into a single rule for the time being... so I was hoping anyone who has 5min and would like inputs into the Mods decision for this rule, could you answer the below questions - just a quick one liner on your view of how these should be covered when scoring (5 questions, 5 answers in bullet point would be ace)

1) If SL coach names a player who was NOT named in AFL. Should 1st emg cover them?

2) If SL coach names a player who was listed as AFL emergency (THUR > SAT games). Should 1st emg cover them?

3) If SL coach names a player who was listed as AFL extended interchange (SUN games). Should 1st emg cover them?

4) If SL coach names a player who was listed in AFL 22 and they were a LATE OUT. Should 1st emg cover them?

5) In any of the above scenarios, should the "1st emg" instead be "a like for like emg" from the list of 8 emg the SL coach names? (if so, which one)

Mods understand each coach has varied views, so a YES/NO along with a bit more detail in q5 would be ace. We'll then feed this into defining the SL rule.

Given we have locked down the list of preference in emergencies and capped at 8, it's only the above componant that we need to confirm.

Hope this helps us get closer.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Forum timezone: GMT+11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.