Re: Question -- Girdles Corsets and More

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:24:36 10/17/24 Thu
Author: Observer
Subject: Re: Question
In reply to: Alex A 's message, "Re: Question" on 22:00:55 10/14/24 Mon

I suggest that there's no single amount by which "unstretched" would differ from "stretched" girdle size. I recall my wife once having a black, all-elastic girdle with just a couple of double-elastic areas, one at he front and one at the back. Unstretched it looked ridiculously small and I remember joking that she surely wouldn't be able to get it on. In fact, she could pull it on with ease. I would guess that the expansion was to about 150% of its unstretched size.
Later, with her firm control girdles, it was much more difficult to forcibly stretch them and the expanded size when worn was probably only about 110% of the unstretched size.
So, I think it all depends on the strength of the elastic plus the amount of doubled or non-stretch panelling.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Question -- Leslie, 14:22:40 10/17/24 Thu
- Re: Question -- Leslie i, 07:10:57 10/18/24 Fri

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>I suggest that there's no single amount by which >"unstretched" would differ from "stretched" girdle >size. I recall my wife once having a black, >all-elastic girdle with just a couple of >double-elastic areas, one at he front and one at the >back. Unstretched it looked ridiculously small and I >remember joking that she surely wouldn't be able to >get it on. In fact, she could pull it on with ease. >I would guess that the expansion was to about 150% of >its unstretched size. >Later, with her firm control girdles, it was much more >difficult to forcibly stretch them and the expanded >size when worn was probably only about 110% of the >unstretched size. >So, I think it all depends on the strength of the >elastic plus the amount of doubled or non-stretch >panelling.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.