Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>I suggest that there's no single amount by which >>"unstretched" would differ from "stretched" girdle >>size. I recall my wife once having a black, >>all-elastic girdle with just a couple of >>double-elastic areas, one at he front and one at the >>back. Unstretched it looked ridiculously small and I >>remember joking that she surely wouldn't be able to >>get it on. In fact, she could pull it on with ease. >>I would guess that the expansion was to about 150% of >>its unstretched size. >>Later, with her firm control girdles, it was much more >>difficult to forcibly stretch them and the expanded >>size when worn was probably only about 110% of the >>unstretched size. >>So, I think it all depends on the strength of the >>elastic plus the amount of doubled or non-stretch >>panelling. > >Hello Observer, >I do agree with Alex however that the girdle waist >size should be more than 5cm as specified by Lina. >Leslie

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.