Bizarre Arguments -- The Immigration Page vii

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: Bizarre Arguments

Author:
MRM
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 23:29:42 09/29/18 Sat

Amongst all else,
we've seen the most bizarre reasons imaginable as to why we should accept mass immigration.

And, it usually becomes mainstream.

This thread will deal with such outlandish ideas.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Re: Without them, we wouldn't have ethnic food

Author:
MRM
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 00:03:46 09/30/18 Sun

There's one ridiculous argument that simply will not go away.

People often claim that without mass immigration, we wouldn't have all this tasty food available.

So, in essence; the only way to have good food is by bringing endless 3rd World Populations.

and, if these immigrants are able to assimilate quickly, they'll lose their ability to make foreign foods.
SO we'll need a new supply of 1st-generation migrants.

Apparently, none of these people have ever been to a Grocery Store.
There's plenty of food available which rivals exotic dishes.

Basically;
the "globalists" insist that the only way Swedes can enjoy Soul Food is by having Blacks living next door.
Or,
If Finns wanna taste Mexican food; they must bring Mexicans.

These are very bizarre arguments.
ALSO NOTICE that such rules only apply to Western nations.
Globalists never tell Mexicans to get a taste of Russian food by bringing Russian immigrants into Mexico.

Plus; Pro-Migration forces dictate that we MUST accept all that diverse ethnic food.
Did you notice that we're all being forced to accept this idea?
They're telling us that we're gonna get a large dose of Mexican food, whether we like it or not.
And, we're incapable of making our own Tacos ?????

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> Subject: "they're responsible for most great inventions"

Author:
MRM
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:37:48 09/30/18 Sun

When pushing for mass-immigration; the Open-Borders forces give any reason imaginable.

One outlandish example is the claim that we need inventors; ....and foreigners are always the best innovators.

You've probably seen specific examples of revolutionary "new ideas" created by such brilliant Minds.

....."Google was created by a refugee".
....."Yahoo was created by an immigrant".
..."and, ....the Samsung Galaxy".

(1)
You'll first notice that various creations (such as Google and Yahoo) are NOT inventions.
And, there's nothing groundbreaking about them whatsoever.

Once the Internet was created, it was inevitable that we'd have things like this.
and quite frankly; our lives would be better-off without mega-Corporations such as Google & Yahoo.
The World Wide Web was created to freely exchange ideas.
But instead; a few giant corporations account for 80% of all traffic.

(2)
Companies such as Google & Yahoo were partially (not Wholly) created by American workers, teams of designers,
engineers, ...and immigrants.
It WASN'T just immigrants alone.
You'll notice that mainstream Media attempts to give ALL credit to them; while ignoring the entire staff.

and, as stated before; these corporations did not break new ground.
Yahoo has corrupted the news industry.
and Google has virtually monopolized the internet.
Also notice: the Google Search-engine was so simplistic because its authors didn't even have basic HTML skills.

(3)
The Samsung Galaxy wasn't an invention.
It's an excellent name-brand. But, not a revolutionary advancement.
Once Computers were given Operating Systems; it was inevitable that they'd eventually become palm-sized.
And, the Android Operating System is based upon IBM's Linux open-source. It can be used with any device.
ALSO, needless to say; we import Samsung from Korea.
Thus, it wasn't necessary to bring their populations or headquarters here.
Their Corporation functions efficiently in Korea. And, we're able to import their products.
Therefore, your pro-migration rhetoric doesn't hold water.

(4)
"The Search-Engine was invented by an 'immigrant'."
Actually, Google did not invent the Search engine.
And, if you observe our Voy-Links project; you'll learn there were over a dozen excellent rivals which are now defunct.

(5)
Oddly, many African-American inventions are listed on websites which celebrate the 'accomplishments' of immigrants.

SO, it's now assumed that since you're trying to categorize all Blacks as "refugees"; this is just a code-word for NON-WHITE.
That's what you're really driving at.

"Immigrant" is just a code-word for Non-White.

(6)
Ironically;
The World Wide Web was invented by a White Man, Tim Berners-Lee.
It was not invented by Samsung, Google, or Yahoo.
Even more ironically;
this was accomplished outside the United States.
But we still enjoy the internet nonetheless.

Believe it or not; it's NOT necessary for all inventions to be achieved within the USA.

(Note: Berners-Lee also founded W3C to improve the internet standards).

(7)
Finally;
We often see "immigrant" Inventors mainly because they WANT to migrate into Western countries.
They'd rather relocate here than remaining within their native birthplace.
This is why many engineers from abroad currently reside in the USA.
IT's not because they're superior beings. Or because we cannot survive without them.

They simply don't wanna live in India or Pakistan.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One final note:
You'll notice that Global Forces insistently claim that we need Innovative Minds from abroad.
They are bound & determined to prove that we'd be completely helpless without them.

....they even ruin our educational system in order to diminish our engineering skills....
...but that's a different story altogether...

______________________________________________________________

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> Subject: "Without immigrants, we'd still be living in the Stone-Age

Author:
mars
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:56:23 10/01/18 Mon

There's a recurring theme throughout this entire forum.

Always notice that Global Extremists completely disregard host populations.
They're not merely telling us to accept immigrants. Or, to give equality for all.
But instead, they completely ignore longstanding citizens.

So, in other words:
If you've been here for more than 3 generations: Your interests don't matter.
....You no longer count.

They are NOT merely trying to create a society inclusive to immigrants; ...but exclusive.

And that's something you've gotta keep watching for.
Every time the globalists speak; their entire interests are centered around migrants.
... and they alone.

and here's an extreme example.
There was a blogger website focusing on the contributions of immigrants.
and, it grew to the point of obsession.

So, a commenter pointed this out.
In which case, the blogger responded by saying "Without immigrants; we'd still be living in the stone age".

In which he proceeded to credit immigrants for giving us the industrial revolution.

So, this writer is trying to say that without the 'great migration'; we would've never been pushed into the modern age.

You can easily challenge this claim by observing the inventions of Anglo-Americans and Germans compared to others.
But, in this case, the author would now classify Anglo-Settlers as "immigrants" since it fits the narrative here.

So, in a sense; we're all immigrants !!!.

This mentality has dominated the mainstream media for over a century.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> Subject: "We need a Free exchange of ideas"

Author:
MRM
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 02:44:54 10/11/18 Thu

And, here's another ridiculous claim:
They're telling us that immigration [helps to spread ideas].

It's useful to freely exchange information among different societies.

FIRST Point:
There's NO need for mass migration in order to share ideas.
We already have these abilities without an influx of people.
Modern inventions such as Television, Radio, Internet, and telephone can be used instead.

Second Point:
We possess a higher level of knowledge & technology than our counterparts.
So, why would it be necessary to bring 3rd World populations ????
How are THEY gonna 'set us straight'?

Recap:
So, let's get this straight.
You're claiming that..
- society advances when there's an [open flow-of-ideas].
- and, of course; it always has to be between different peoples.
- never similar cultures.
(for example: they discourage exchanges between White British and White Canadians.
or, between White Germans, Swedes, Russians, Greeks, Ukrainians, etc.).

- Instead; We're supposed to believe that welcoming alien cultures is in our own best interest.
- and, of course, it's always 'better' this way.

- Outsiders are always preferred. (though ironically; migrants are allowed to show in-group preferences).

(...If The Left's attitudes were genuinely impartial [...as they so-claim]; then it shouldn't matter who we are).
But clearly, the global migration forces are trying to stack the cards in favor of non-Whites.

- and, there's never a fair exchange.
(foreign populations always benefit; while our best-interests are ignored).

Yet somehow, this "shared technology" always requires an influx of migrants rather than telecommunications.
and, we're supposed to believe that 3rd World populations have all the knowledge ???

- AND, in order to 'share' this information; we must permanently welcome them into our societies?
Apparently; These people can't just write a book, and share their information through literature.

It's always necessary to read between the lines.
This is all meant to be favor non-European migrants.

- it's a meticulously planned outcome which is only beneficial to them, not us.
The so-called New World Order is designed to be One-Sided.

.......and, that fact should be obvious to everyone...

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> Subject: Bizarre Arguments "They'll fight our wars !"

Author:
admin
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:41:40 10/14/18 Sun

now here's a funny argument.

Many globalists claim that mass-immigration helps because "it strengthens the military".

Immigrants are anxious to join the armed-services and defend our country !!!

SO, they're a good source of young, healthy fighters who'll 'help us' win our next war.

Ironically, there IS some truth to these claims.
In the past, many Hispanic immigrants were statistically enlisting in the military.

However, this proves that globalists aren't really trying to prevent war.
They're stoking the fire with armies of able-bodied soldiers.

part 2:

Also note: this argument has all become obsolete over time.
Newer statistics show that migrants have a greater loyalty to their native country.
For example; an illegal alien from Mexico would be more likely to fight a battle for Mexico than USA.
They'd even side with Mexico if there was a civil conflict between these 2 nations.

Chinese Americans have been known to steal military secrets for their native country: Communist China.

Jewish Americans have committed acts of spying and espionage for their native Israel.
Other ethnic-nationals also feel a loyalty to their native homelands.

part 3:
In 2018; more "British" Muslims joined ISIS than those joining the British Military.
(such as ISIS, and other terror groups).
Plus, they also return home in order to defend their native country).
After fighting these wars; they're somehow allowed to return to the U.K.

Also, more "British" Jews joined the Israeli army than those joining the British military.
So, there's no question as to whom their loyalty is given.
These Israeli-British Jews often have the option between returning to England, or stay.
IF they decide to remain in Israel; they're still allowed to vote in U.K. elections.

Yet, all of this is being done for the sake of "Globalism"?
Not so.
It's clearly a cultural war against Western nations.
Only non-Europeans benefit from this arrangement.

part 4:
IT seems; a different set of rules applies to White people.
We're told to accept open borders, and 'globalism';
While other ethnic groups are allowed to maintain a strong sense of identity.
and, in many cases; they're even willing to defend their nationality.
...here or abroad.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> Subject: Bizarre Arguments: "It's The Law !!!!"

Author:
shn
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:38:49 11/17/18 Sat

If we try to criticize mass-immigration;
our opponents will often say that we're legally bound to accept them.

"There was a U.N. agreement back in 1953; and it clearly states that you've gotta take refugees".

Since when are we supposed to follow rules just because someone forces it upon us?

part 2:
Let's also consider that powerful elitists can infiltrate our government;
and make rules which are contrary to our national best interest.

So, they make unreasonable laws while expecting you to follow.

For example:
The E.U. dictates that each European nation must accept Migrants from incompatible nations.
These are the rules. and we're supposed to follow them.
Ironically, many hippies subscribe to this conformity (despite their forthright Activism).
---
So, on the one hand, Fake Liberals are always protesting against the system.
But, they take a different stance when rules are being forced upon us.
---

part 3:
The U.N. often proposes legislation (such as the Global compact for migration);
this can be implemented without public consent.
And, we're given no choice whatsoever.

Why? "Because it's the Law !"

What if "The Law" entitled them to literally enslave us?
At one time, "Slavery" was The Law.

Therefore, these bizarre arguments clearly don't hold water.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]