Re: But not at 17 -- A nice red bottom

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: But not at 17

Author:
St J Girl

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:49:06 04/10/26 Fri
In reply to: Ashlynn 's message, "But not at 17" on 05:09:47 04/10/26 Fri

I thought I was too old at 16. Same at 17 and 18. My dad felt otherwise. He paddled my bare bottom through high school. Looking back, it did me no harm. In fact, it did me good despite the embarrassment at the time.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: Re: But not at 17

Author:
Alfred22 for St J Girl
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 06:54:43 04/11/26 Sat

Glad you look back on it as beneficial.

When it is felt to be unjust, it is often useless or worse. If you knew that you earned it, then it can get your attention and be quite helpful. Sometimes, of course, you think that you don't need any help and may even believe that forcing the help on you is unjust. I felt that way on a beltline punishment in scouts and that way when I got a parking ticket for being two hours, almost, over what I paid for on the meter.

Now a bit older, I realize that both were beneficial, earned, and totally justified. You may find yourself thinking similarly later just as I have. What helped the most was trying to think of an alternate way to handle the offenses.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> Subject: Re: But not at 17
Author: St J Girl (to Alfred22) [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 07:50:15 04/11/26 Sat Time does change one's perspective. My dad paddled hard, but not excessively, and never punished without good cause. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> Subject: Re: But not at 17

Author:
Alfred22 for StJ Girl
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:06:55 04/11/26 Sat

There was a general belief that unless you were spanked hard, it didn't do any good or even work. What do you think? Did you ever get one that wasn't hard and deliberately try to make it "work" anyway? So, you wouldn't get another one that was really hard and guaranteed to work?

And, how hard was hard? Could you feel it two days later?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: But not at 17

Author:
St J Girl (to Alfred22)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:01:53 04/11/26 Sat

I'm sure my dad believed that. I tend to believe it too. If a spanking isn't hard enough to make a girl wish she had made a different choice and think twice about making the same choice again, it's probably ineffective. You don't want the naughty girl walking away from the spanking thinking, "that wasn't so bad."

My dad's paddle was relatively thin. It had a lot of sting and little thud. He spanked long and hard. Just how long and how hard varied by our ages, how badly we misbehaved, etc. The paddlings were bare bottom and stung like holy hell. When we got paddled, our promises, pleas, and screeching could be heard throughout the house. The paddle turned our bottoms fiery red and hot and sore for several hours. The next morning, the redness was usually gone, but there was still some tenderness, not unlike a mild sunburn. Within 24-36 hours, the pain completely subsided.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: But not at 17

Author:
Alfred22 for St J Girl
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:51:49 04/19/26 Sun

I did think exactly as you mention: Those four left hand hand-spanks weren't all that bad and I was more surprised that they didn't hurt all that much and that it was left-handed!

But, I cried a bit and vowed to myself that I wouldn't say anything like "Ha, ha -- it didn't really hurt that bad!" Rather I would try to make sure he didn't need to do it again anytime soon. So, I think there might be room for mild spankings in some spanking regimens. At least, for kids who are basically in control of their conduct.

Most of my friends never got a lighter spanking and so perhaps neither did Brenda. I suspect that just to get the razor strop to land across a naughty bottom, it has to be the result of a good solid swing. So any spanking with the razor strop is going to be way hard enough to be educational by the usual measure of hard enough to keep the naughty behavior from being "worth it." Brenda, did you ever feel the razor strop but think what you did was worth it?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: But not at 17
Author: Brenda (To Alfred22/St J Girl) [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 05:24:22 04/23/26 Thu Question (from Alfred22): "Brenda, did you ever feel the razor strop but think what you did was worth it?" Absolutely not. Whenever I got my parents' ultimate punishments, a razor strop whuppin' or a switching, I was one very sorry girl. Whatever I did, no matter how much I wanted to do it, instantly became not worth it. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> Subject: Re: But not at 17
Author: Scott (For St J Girl) [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 13:36:08 04/11/26 Sat I was a spanking dad. FWIW, I spanked my girls in their late teens too. I considered maturity, behavior, and attitude more than chronological age when deciding whether or not to spank. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]