VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]
Subject: Re: Fanny Framing and Other Observations


Author:
Madison for Sarah
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 14:24:15 01/13/25 Mon
In reply to: Sarah to Madison 's message, "Re: Fanny Framing and Other Observations" on 08:36:50 01/11/25 Sat

Thank you for your interest and comments, Sarah.

I cannot disagree with anything you said.

And yes, while I cannot quote the exact date Eliza's dad and I had the discussion with her, it has been an extraordinarily long time since she has demonstrated any behavior that would merit any kind of punishment. Normally by this passage of time, she would have earned something like a loss of privileges, but that just has not happened. I think it's a bit ironic how effect a spanking can be as a deterrent to misbehavior, even when it is just threatened, not actually administered. All of this said, as I mentioned before, my little princess seems to be inching closer and closer to getting her first ever spanking, as her sassy attitude is becoming more and more prevalent...she is beginning to skate on thin ice.

I particularly agree with you about not showing preferential treatment for Miss Eliza, given we have come this far with erasing a differing approach for consequences, based on gender. Please don't get me wrong, I'm not one to believe everything in life should be the same for boys and girls, they are different for a reason - but - when it comes to punishments, I believe - NOW - they should be totally equal.

All boys AND all girls, have been gifted with the perfect place for chastisement, as I believe the Good Lord intended, so why should it be utilized only for boys and not for girls? Being honest with myself, my sister and I, when growing up, should have been treated just exactly as our brothers were. She and I have actually discussed this and she completely agrees with me. Sometimes we learn best from our parent's mistakes.

A bared bottom provides a perfect place to administer correction to a misbehaving child and I have no issue with any parent or grandparent (or any other trusted adult) utilizing this "target area" to instill discipline...but OTOH, anyone who would strike any child - boy or girl - on some other part of their body such as the face, head, chest, or back, belongs in prison, IMO.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Login ] Create Account May soon be required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.