VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:09:33 11/03/14 Mon
Author: Lazlo
Author Host/IP: NoHost / 32.216.152.35
Subject: Re: What Really happened in February 1967?
In reply to: George 's message, "What Really happened in February 1967?" on 11:16:54 09/24/14 Wed

"Was it because Brian lost the love of his life, Anita? Or did Brian feel abandoned/betrayed by the Stones (Keith and Mick)? I suppose I should say only say Keith and not Mick because it was Keith who stole (he says recued) Anita away from Brian"


If I had to choose George, I'd pick the latter. From what I've read, (haven't got Trynka's book yet) I don't think it was as much losing Anita as it was "losing' Keith. I think that was the ultimate line drawn in the sand that there was no coming back from.
For some reason, I really don't get the impression the loss of Anita left Brian in a perpetual sulking mode as history's somewhat made him out to be. After the departure of Anita, Brian seemed to do alright female-wise. Off the top of my head, I can think of Nico, Linda Keith, Suki Potier, Anna Wohlin, and of course, we now know that Brian managed to father a daughter also. Not bad for a guy who supposedly lost the love of his life, huh?
Additionally, I never went for the "Keith stole Anita from Brian" mindset. Keith didn't "steal" her. She went quite willingly. In hindsight, for Brian's sake, Keith really did Brian a favor by running off with Anita. Imagine if it were Brian that Anita got hooked on heroin? He might not have ever lived to see 1969!

As far as the band goes, Keith running off with Anita created too much of a rift between Brian and Keith (who by then was very solidly aligned with Mick) to ever recover from. Brian's days in the band were numbered from then on. I don't see it as much of a downhill slide as I do seeing it was Brian getting his act together enough to walk away from the band he created and try to stand on his feet again. Too bad somebody killed him before he could get the chance.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.