VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:22:54 08/14/01 Tue
Author: Marco
Subject: Re: Suggestion for next draft, regarding sleepers etc.
In reply to: Paul J 's message, "Re: Suggestion for next draft, regarding sleepers etc." on 09:43:53 08/14/01 Tue

I also think that Ton's idea is a great way to make
this holdout working (if we have to keep it).

>Yep I totally agree with your first idea. From the
>d20 i could accept the numbers 1-14 for the first
>round and then choose a team whos draft position is
>the same as the number which is rolled.

We have 18 teams, however I would think it better if
we spare the first 3-5 draft picks. These teams were the
very worst in the league and they deserve all the help
they can get. After all the goal should be to make
the league more competitive.

>Second idea is fine and could work well.

Dont forget to select also the 2 negative sleepers
that way. These players will most likely end in the
FA trash can, so selecting them in a fair way is also
important.

One last note about the rookies quality:
as I have written allready, it was by design that the
defense was bad (I did the same with them as Paul did
with the FWL defense before the last season) The goal
is to keep the defense weak to allow the offense to
work normaly.

There may also be not the deepness in the offensive
positions, but this way early picks are more important.
And also too many offensive stars create also problems,
as I have seen in the stats of the last CWL season.

However before the next CWL season, I will ask Paul
what positions he want to be deep in talent, and
where he wants superstars and what position should be
weak in usable players.

bye and tschuess,
Marco

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.