Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]
|
Date Posted: 02:52:33 04/11/04 Sun
Here's where YOU are dead wrong. The village only follows the village code when they feel it is to their benefit. They have not followed the village code when it comes to the noise level or the lights as it affects the residents near the little league park. I have friends who live across from the park and nothing has been done for two years about the problems they encounter.
If you want to quote village code, here's what it says in regards to what I just mentioned and none of this has been followed by the village or the recreation department:
A.No light on any part of a premises licensed hereunder shall be permitted to shine beyond the property line of the premises. All exterior lights on such premises shall be equipped with shielding devices so that the glow emanating therefrom shall be directed only on and toward such premises
The lights have no shields, and the lights shine past the property line of the ballpark into residents windows
D.No music shall be played in any place of public assembly either by mechanical device or live performance in such a manner that the sound emanating therefrom shall be audible beyond the property line of the premises whereon the place of public assembly is located. At no time shall music be played either by mechanical device or live performance in a manner which either annoys, disturbs, injures, endangers or tends to annoy, disturb, injure or endanger the comfort, repose, health, peaceful enjoyment or safety of other persons or the public.
E.No loud, unnecessary or unusual noise or any noise shall be permitted to be made, continued or caused to be made or continued, which either annoys, disturbs, injures or tends to annoy, disturb, injure or endanger the comfort, repose, health, peaceful enjoyment or safety of other persons or the public.
Noise from people arriving and leaving the games cause disturbance to the residents and the public address system is loud and clear in the residents homes when announcements are made and music played.
The village does not follow it's own code for everything. They want the landowner to give up their rights to do what they want with their property for the good of the community, but unless you know someone who is connected to the village board or it's committees in some way, you are not allowed to use your property as you see fit. If they were going to designate it a landmark, it should have been done already, not when an issue like this arises.
In my conversations with residents of the village, nobody is happy with the way the village is run and most could care less about the waterfront area. As for illegal means being used to cause harm to the project, that is their property that they own and pay taxes on. They handed in the appropriate paperwork and did what they set out to do with their property. If the village can do whatever they want with property they own and not give a darn about the residents it affects, then likewise for those property owners. The village has NO right to do whatever they want.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
|