Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7 ] |
| Subject: Mike's Definition of Wilder's Red Satan | |
|
Author: FTJ Author Host/IP: 207.200.116.132 |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 21:03:20 03/06/06 Mon I just want to say, that I am in full agreement with the fact that the breeding of Spike and Maud produced DUSTER. This is why I have made the statement that Duster is not a Hemphill dog in the same case % of Wilder's Red Satan. This means that you Mike got the wrong dog and had to put it down. Wilder's Red Satan was not available to you because you were not anywhere near first canidate to have that dog. I think the term was "black balled". You got a red pup that was not a litter mate to Wilder's Red Satan so you produced your own through the Spike and Maud breeding, which is now known as DUSTER. I rest my case and thanks for letting just enough of the truth out so I could make this statement. Thats why you never were in approval of what Hanna or OFBA did with WILDER'S RED SATAN. For you it meant a slap in the breeding face of your yard and what you hoped people would believe. You have ROSS RED DEVIL and thats it. If anyone look at the pictures of your dogs and what you are producing today, it is all RRD not Hemphill. You have even gone so far as to say, all OFRN are not red? gee, what a creepy thing to say! [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| Subject | Author | Date |
| WHAT AN IDIOT | JRB (206.116.33.170) | 06:27:56 03/07/06 Tue |
| Re: Mike's Definition of Wilder's Red Satan | Mike Norrod (67.177.152.140) | 07:23:26 03/07/06 Tue |