Re: moderation, censorship or ... -- RSQUBF discussion forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:37:38 04/20/05 Wed
Author: Joe
Subject: Re: moderation, censorship or ...
In reply to: Tony Lang 's message, "Re: moderation, censorship or ..." on 08:45:09 04/20/05 Wed

>think that we should try to reach out to is the
>minority to whom this does not apply.
>You know the story of the lost sheep the ninety and
>nine got left. As Disiree said We are their only hope.

Can anyone name even one person who was convinced to leave UBF or try to "change" UBF through the "discussions" that we have had on the RSQUBF forum over the past 3-4 years? I can't. They have to see and experience the problems firsthand, and even then it takes divine intervention for them to actually recognize it as a problem. Example: UBFSoul (not exactly a core member of UBF) recognizing the truth about UBF "marriage by faith" after hearing a "testimony" at a UBF conference.

That's why I think it's a mistake to continue to focus on a perhaps open-minded "minority" in UBF; I know of a small handful of people in this "minority," and they won't touch this forum with a 10-foot pole. The focus should be on creating a place for more former members to connect and express their feelings and experiences, without having to fear the wolves (in shepherds' clothing) that they fled from; this forum currently is not such a place.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

All who should come out have come out -- Chris, 14:03:58 04/20/05 Wed
- All who should come out <em>will</em> come out -- PECAS, 20:33:10 04/20/05 Wed
  - Re: All who should come out will come out -- Chris, 01:52:35 04/21/05 Thu
  - Re: All who should come out <em>will</em> come out -- Tony Lang, 01:54:11 04/21/05 Thu
    - Re: All who should come out will come out -- Chris, 04:36:16 04/21/05 Thu
Rsqubf Provides a Contribution -- PECAS, 20:07:49 04/20/05 Wed
Re: moderation, censorship or ... -- Tony Lang, 01:37:11 04/21/05 Thu
- Re: moderation, censorship or ... -- Chris, 02:08:33 04/21/05 Thu
- Re: moderation, censorship or ... -- Joe, 10:03:04 04/21/05 Thu
  - Re: moderation, censorship or ... -- Tony Lang, 09:02:07 04/23/05 Sat
Re: moderation, censorship or ... -- Desiree S Ray, 08:47:12 04/21/05 Thu
- Re: moderation, censorship or ... -- ChicagoXile, 10:09:30 04/21/05 Thu
  - Re: moderation, censorship or ... -- Desiree S. Ray, 10:39:30 04/21/05 Thu