Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: amalgamated teams - apology Author: Olivia [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 22:44:29 11/11/03 Tue In reply to: Shell 's message, "Re: amalgamated teams - apology" on 20:58:26 11/11/03 Tue Having read all the above thread, I felt I had to comment on what is going on. Obviously, given the rules, no Camb dancer can possibly amalgamate, so that is not an option. Whether or not the TC chooses to enter the remaining dancers at Warwick is up to them, but I really cannot see what harm it can possibly do. Bristol never send a whole team to Warwick, because of availability of couples/readiness etc, yet they go and use it as an experience. There is also no reason why the couples in question cannot just enter the opens..... I was quite shocked to read the comments here about the decision made, firstly because it appears one person's decision is affecting others' right to dance, but also because such grievances are being aired openly. I am a complete outsider, no longer a student but eager for the circuit to go from strength to strength - surely this isn;t the way forward? I hope CDC sort it out to everyone's satisfaction, but please, I don't think its fair to have such a conversation up on this board. I would personally be very upset if I were the person whose decision was up for discussion. Olivia ex Bristol - views expressed are my own and no reflection on Bristol's position or policies!!! [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: amalgamated teams - apology Rachelle 01:07:34 11/12/03 Wed Re: amalgamated teams - apology -- Olivia, 09:47:06 11/12/03 Wed Re: amalgamated teams - apology -- TimC, 10:06:04 11/12/03 Wed Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Ali, 11:06:40 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- TimC, 12:23:39 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Ali, 12:36:53 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Paul J, 12:50:54 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Ian, 12:58:37 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Tim C, 13:57:25 11/12/03 Wed This house believes -- Ian, 14:16:14 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Joanne, 15:03:12 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Justine, 15:15:09 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Ali, 13:56:23 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Paul J, 14:52:38 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Ali, 15:09:04 11/12/03 Wed Re: Amalgamated teams - interpreting the constitution -- Tim C, 16:24:13 11/12/03 Wed