Fulham should scrap the women's team. Waste of money. -- SW6.doc

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Monday, January 20, 10:25:57pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sunday, January 12, 08:33:24pm
Author: PC nonsense
Author Host/IP: host86-191-39-143.range86-191.btcentralplus.com / 86.191.39.143
Subject: Fulham should scrap the women's team. Waste of money.
In reply to: gezza 's message, "Fulham Womens - £1 was it too much to pay for that?" on Sunday, January 12, 04:39:51pm

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Feel like some of you are ready to join the taliban and ban woman from sports schools and jobs. Woman do not compare their game to the men’s game, and they play because they want to and love doing so. No one forces you to watch them, and our girls are having a great season in their league with yesterday being their first loss of the season. Like I say you don’t have to watch them, but you could at least get behind them as after all they are FULHAM (NT) -- Hg, Monday, January 13, 08:43:20am (NoHost/31.94.64.40)

Some female footballers think they are the equal of the mens game. That's why we have an army of them being paid handsomely to provide expert analysis of the elite mens game. (NT) -- Hammersmithender, Monday, January 13, 10:34:19am (NoHost/31.94.74.67)

They are a very small minority. And yes I don’t agree with the woman pundits on men’s football as like you say they have never played that game. Have absolutely no problem with female commentators or hosts, but expert analysis is just wrong. (NT) -- Hg, Monday, January 13, 10:40:50am (NoHost/31.94.64.40)
- The number of female pundits is limited by the vacancies available. I'm sure there are plenty more who think they are experts. As for commentators, I have no issue if they get the job on merit. But I suspect there is tokenism involved. Plus, I have to admit, I don't really enjoy hearing a girls voice commentating on the mens game. But that might only be because I'm an old fart. (NT) -- Hammersmithender, Monday, January 13, 11:26:45am (NoHost/31.94.74.66)
  - There is one woman commentator who’s voice really gets to me forget her name, there’s also a few male commentators that I can’t stand either. Also as much as I love gentleman Jim, and I do. He is a terrible commentator, half the time you have no clue what’s going on as he doesn’t actual tell you what’s happening , and him and Jamie love to go off on rants about things that have nothing to do with the game. (NT) -- Hg, Monday, January 13, 11:35:45am (NoHost/31.94.64.40)
    - I have no problem with female pundits if they are knowledgeable or insightful - no different from the men. Many old pros offer v little insight to games whereas decent football analysts like Adam Clery of 442 offer way more insight. Also no problem with female anchors - Gabby Logan/Kelly Cates as good as any. Do struggle with many/most female commentators since voices get a bit screechy when excited or under stress. You need the right voice tone to commentate without irritating (NT) -- f bloke, Monday, January 13, 01:59:20pm (host86-134-8-67.range86-134.btcentralplus.com/86.134.8.67)
      - and don't get me started on co-commentators -can’t stand any of them which is one reason why I watch almost no football shown live on TV these days. Just wish the co-commentators would understand that less is much much more. Fulham games are the worst - if we are not playing well don't need bleedin Steve McManaman or Alan Smith constantly to bang on about it. Really wish there was crowd noise only option on all platforms. (NT) -- f bloke, Monday, January 13, 02:06:13pm (host86-134-8-67.range86-134.btcentralplus.com/86.134.8.67)
      - Whatever knowledge and insight the female pundits offer doesn't come from experience. For every female pundit there is a better qualified male pundit who didn't get the job. (NT) -- Hammersmithender, Monday, January 13, 03:02:21pm (NoHost/31.94.74.67)
        I think you don't need the playing experience to be a pundit - I think most ex pros don't have the work ethic or the intellectual rigour to match the best analysts - the BBC lot have next to no analytical insights whatsoever - they just pitch up and wing it. That said - not sure I have seen any of the female pundits really stand out on the analytics front although as an anchor I think Gabby Logan reads the game better than a good number of former pro pundits (NT) -- f bloke, Monday, January 13, 04:10:23pm (host86-134-8-67.range86-134.btcentralplus.com/86.134.8.67)

Agreed. (NT) -- MH, Tuesday, January 14, 05:08:15am (180-150-112-232.NBN.mel.aussiebb.net/180.150.112.232)

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.