VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:24:17 10/19/01 Fri
Author: Curious George
Subject: Nason's

Is anyone else upset at the fact that Nason's got a "slap on the wrist" for the illegal gambling going on in their establishment, or is it just me? I am not sure about the law in full, but I was under the impression that licenses had to be upheld truthfully, disclosing "accurately" all that was included in an establishment. Code break one. They mentioned 2 machines, but had 4.
Second, is not gambling in Massachusetts, except for race tracks and the lottery illegal? Code break 2.
Third, can you imagine the cost to the taxpayers on this "sting" operation that was commenced by our Police dept., only to have Nason's only punishment being the surrender of all machines? Ethics code break 1.

Either Nason's knows someone in town, or someone "special" frequented that establishment to lead me to the conclusion that Nason's was given special circumstances for breaking the law in many ways. Their license should have been pulled, and very hefty fines enforced.

They might not have gambling machines in their back rooms anymore, but you can bet your sweet BIPPIE that they will find other ways to compensate for their loss in wages. And, it won't be upping the price of a sub!

Did the Dracut Shopping News report this incorrectly, and am I missing something, or do I smell some bad political decisions here.

And, who was the selectman that raised his eyebrows (direct quote) but still did not pull the license.

Curious. Extremely curious.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.