VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 05:20:08 09/09/22 Fri
Author: No name
Subject: Re: Another illustrative report
In reply to: Garr Wy 's message, "Re: Another illustrative report" on 19:50:05 09/08/22 Thu

My impression is that there is a growing tendency to control every body function during procedures in kids. Even though a kid could pee on the table, it is an equal possibility that urine can fill the bladder without coming out, but could come out without control after the procedure, or be blocked for several hours after the procedure, due to the anesthesia. The catheter can hinder such complications. Since this procedure happened in a van with narrow timeframes, there would be little time to resolve these type of problems, so the catheter use looks logical.

But I think there is more to this history that that is told and what I commented on in the first place.

First of all, I think the kid already had been to a doctor that had made a request for tonsillectomy, and that the same is true for the other kids.

But the parents had the choice of having it done in a surgical van without having to pay anything.

I know that these pediatric vans have grown to huge enterprise and the organization operating the vans offer their service as a charity and they cooperate with local hospitals.

But those financing these charity enterprises will of course have some compensation for their offer. I therefore think that the kids possibly were used as object in some research project or as training object for medical personal.

It is highly possible they underwent an endoscopic procedure in their urinary system for these purposes. Even if the only thing that happened with their pelvic parts was the catheter insertion, this could also be for training of nurses.

The wording used by the boy in a report suggest that he himself thought something more had been done. ("At least that is what their said")

That these other things done during tonsillectomy are directed at the pelvic organs, is because these body parts are free to access during tonsillectomies.

Even though I did not write it, the boy possibly got a suppository for pain management and relaxation in their anus before being wake. This is actually something used.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.