God -- James' Cool Message Board About Stuff!

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: God

Author:
Bryan Reed
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 17:31:13 08/07/03 Thu

This one is mostly for Mr. Moore.

What irrefutable proof is there that God does not exist?

There is no irrefutable proof that he exists, this is evident but what irreutable proof is there that he does not exist.

So, the stories in the bible, an imperfect thing written by man, have been proven to be wrong. What does this really prove. That the stories are being proven to be wrong simply proves that the stories are wrong and nothing else.

Could these false stories be stories that, though they were false, were devinely inspired? It can not be proven that they were not.

If someone choses to believe in something that cannot be proven true or false then is he a fool for believing in it, or rather, having faith in it?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

Re: God Rev. William Moore 23:38:46 08/07/03 Thu

Re: God -- Bryan Reed, 00:27:01 08/10/03 Sun

[clipped some due to the forums max line limit of 100] -- Rev. William Moore, 04:14:20 08/10/03 Sun

correction -- Rev. William Moore, 04:17:26 08/10/03 Sun

Re: correction -- Bryan Reed, 08:37:30 08/10/03 Sun

Re: correction -- Rev. William Moore, 17:34:07 08/10/03 Sun

Re: correction -- Rev. William Moore, 17:38:55 08/10/03 Sun

Re: correction -- Rev. William Moore, 18:11:45 08/10/03 Sun

Another correction -- Rev. William Moore, 18:24:58 08/10/03 Sun

Re: [clipped some due to the forums max line limit of 100] -- Rev. William Moore, 04:23:40 08/10/03 Sun

Re: [clipped some due to the forums max line limit of 100] -- Bryan Reed, 09:31:22 08/10/03 Sun

Re: [clipped some due to the forums max line limit of 100] -- Rev. William Moore, 16:56:20 08/10/03 Sun

Re: [clipped some due to the forums max line limit of 100] -- Rev. William Moore, 18:07:15 08/10/03 Sun

Part one -- Bryan Reed, 09:16:31 08/10/03 Sun

Re: Part one -- Rev. William Moore, 16:53:22 08/10/03 Sun

part two -- Bryan Reed, 09:20:01 08/10/03 Sun

Re: part two -- Rev. William Moore, 17:09:44 08/10/03 Sun

part three -- Bryan Reed, 09:22:03 08/10/03 Sun

Re: part three -- Rev. William Moore, 17:16:22 08/10/03 Sun

part four -- Bryan Reed, 09:23:47 08/10/03 Sun

Re: part four -- Rev. William Moore, 17:05:38 08/10/03 Sun

Re: part four -- crackpot, 04:42:43 08/11/03 Mon

Re: part four -- Rev. William Moore, 02:50:55 08/12/03 Tue