Re: They need to look at the merits of the case!! -- The Fieger Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: They need to look at the merits of the case!!

Author:
Gina
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 09/ 1/04 9:05pm
In reply to: Chris 's message, "Re: They need to look at the merits of the case!!" on 09/ 1/04 8:10pm

Amen to that; juries won't even want to sit if the appeals courts can overturn their verdicts. Sounds to me like they're saying "Fieger needs to try the case OUR way", never mind if he's right and can convince a jury.

I always thought that lawyers were supposed to "reach" a jury emotionally; it's an emotional issue - a child born brain damaged - what more emotional issue can there be?

The thing is Geoff knows the law and he is gifted in presenting his client's case. He has done nothing wrong - somebody, somewhere needs to get this For-Caca appellate bunch of bozo's jerked into the present century.

Damn them.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

However....... Gina 09/ 2/04 2:41pm

A brain damaged child's life... -- DivaFonda, 09/ 2/04 5:55pm

Re: A brain damaged child's life... -- Diane, 09/ 2/04 7:40pm

Re: A brain damaged child's life... -- JM, 09/ 2/04 8:08pm

Re: A brain damaged child's life... -- Gina, 09/ 2/04 8:39pm

Re: A brain damaged child's life... -- JM, 09/ 2/04 9:32pm

You mean "tort reform", always touted by Republicans? -- DivaFonda, 09/ 3/04 4:41am
OK, I'm not buying that!! -- Gina, 09/ 3/04 8:04pm

That's ok, I wasn't really selling it (NT) -- JM, 09/ 3/04 10:39pm
Republicans ARE to blame for "tort reform" in many states. -- DivaFonda, 09/ 4/04 1:06am

Re: Republicans ARE to blame for "tort reform" in many states. -- Gina, 09/ 4/04 3:52pm

Re: Republicans ARE to blame for "tort reform" in many states. -- JM, 09/ 4/04 4:19pm

Here's another point of view -- Diane, 09/ 4/04 4:40pm
Re: Republicans ARE to blame for "tort reform" in many states. -- Gina, 09/ 4/04 5:38pm

Re: Republicans ARE to blame for "tort reform" in many states. -- JM, 09/ 4/04 5:47pm

"Punitive damages". -- DivaFonda, 09/ 5/04 5:11pm

Re: "Punitive damages". -- Gina, 09/ 5/04 7:13pm

It's NOT exhorbitant, the child's life is OVER!! -- DivaFonda, 09/ 6/04 12:35am