(Clarification) This is not a go at The Ox and Johns trade -- SuperLeague

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

13/06/26 10:17pm [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 3/07/20 5:57pm
Author: D9
Subject: (Clarification) This is not a go at The Ox and Johns trade
In reply to: D9 's message, "Yes, but what is the commodity worth if the rules change" on 3/07/20 5:45pm

Under the current environment, that trade seems to be fair. But if other sides, who stockpile ruckman wasn't happening, the solution would be much easier to rectify than having to give away such a high draft pick.

Or, something that isn't ideal is having two sides weakening in a certain aspect.

The Ox, will have short term success with Sinclair and Frawley, and mediocre success with Townsend and Gibbons. In a couple of years, his age profile will be poor, as it was a year or so ago when he had many 30+ players.

John on the other hand, if Rankin continued to get injured, will have poor depth because he gave four players to gain one. Then have very "Off the pace" players who in the AFL may not even be there next year when list cuts come in with the players he gets to replace the holes with mid season picks, or late picks in the National Draft at years end.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Maybe I'm banging my own drum ... But -- '51 Bewick, 3/07/20 6:24pm
Maxxy -- Brendan, 3/07/20 6:30pm
- Changing rules, changes the ability to do the same though -- D9, 3/07/20 6:59pm
  - I completely understand and here is my thoughts -- John, 3/07/20 8:23pm
    - No cap (NT) -- Maxwell, 3/07/20 9:04pm
      - Absoluitely Not (NT) -- '51 Bewick, 3/07/20 9:27pm
      - Then.. -- John, 4/07/20 9:52am
        Most if not all have between 14-17 talls according to the Balance List Sheet. -- tenderWARRIOR, 4/07/20 12:35pm
        I disagree -- D9, 6/07/20 12:53pm
        I stand by my comments. -- tenderWARRIOR, 6/07/20 3:00pm
    - Do you think McEvoy is still worth a 1st rounder? :) -- tenderWARRIOR, 3/07/20 9:38pm
      - Probably not but.. -- John, 4/07/20 9:57am
        It seems going on the comments, some coaches ask for too much. -- tenderWARRIOR, 4/07/20 1:04pm
        You're right Aaaron!! -- Maxwell, 4/07/20 2:35pm
        sorry, last sentence should read -- Maxwell, 4/07/20 2:37pm

Forum timezone: GMT+11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.