Playing players out of position is one thing.. -- SuperLeague

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

15/06/26 7:37am [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 3/07/20 4:38pm
Author: tenderWARRIOR
Subject: Playing players out of position is one thing..
In reply to: Mods 's message, "Note taken, D9 - we're working towards further refining this." on 3/07/20 12:43pm

But playing them according to the Team Balance sheet is totally legit, as this has been santioned and approved by the Mods yeah?

If any Coaches are lamenting the accessibility to KPP players, I think you need to consider that every coach has the same options to draft or trade. Like any commodity they are worth what they are worth, and simply put, things harder to get generally have more value.

Now, if two coaches don't agree on the value of a KPP, that is totally okay - there are 12 other coaches either can trade or deal with... but if everybody is holding onto them, well maybe you need to make better trade offers or use earlier draft picks.

Finally, if a coach does "over value" a player on his list, well that is his prerogative. There is a level of subjectivity in all this as well. I happily admit I value my players more than some other coaches would - that is probably why they are my players 🙂

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

What I've found -- The Ox, 3/07/20 5:23pm
- I have had David Astbury on the trade table every year.. -- tenderWARRIOR, 3/07/20 6:15pm
  - I'm with Aaaron -- Maxwell, 3/07/20 7:43pm
Yes, but what is the commodity worth if the rules change -- D9, 3/07/20 5:45pm
- (Clarification) This is not a go at The Ox and Johns trade -- D9, 3/07/20 5:57pm
  - Maybe I'm banging my own drum ... But -- '51 Bewick, 3/07/20 6:24pm
  - Maxxy -- Brendan, 3/07/20 6:30pm
    - Changing rules, changes the ability to do the same though -- D9, 3/07/20 6:59pm
      - I completely understand and here is my thoughts -- John, 3/07/20 8:23pm
        No cap (NT) -- Maxwell, 3/07/20 9:04pm
        Absoluitely Not (NT) -- '51 Bewick, 3/07/20 9:27pm
        Then.. -- John, 4/07/20 9:52am
        Most if not all have between 14-17 talls according to the Balance List Sheet. -- tenderWARRIOR, 4/07/20 12:35pm
        I disagree -- D9, 6/07/20 12:53pm
        I stand by my comments. -- tenderWARRIOR, 6/07/20 3:00pm
        Do you think McEvoy is still worth a 1st rounder? :) -- tenderWARRIOR, 3/07/20 9:38pm
        Probably not but.. -- John, 4/07/20 9:57am
        It seems going on the comments, some coaches ask for too much. -- tenderWARRIOR, 4/07/20 1:04pm
        You're right Aaaron!! -- Maxwell, 4/07/20 2:35pm
        sorry, last sentence should read -- Maxwell, 4/07/20 2:37pm

Forum timezone: GMT+11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.