VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sat, March 31 2007, 14:35:40 GMT-10
Author: gary
Subject: Re: Advancing the mark 10 metres is STILL a waste a time (Take 2)
In reply to: Stephen 's message, "Advancing the mark 10 metres is STILL a waste a time (Take 2)" on Fri, March 30 2007, 16:27:56 GMT-10

>Regarding Westy's post ----
>
>What a load of "BS" this notion of going thru a series
>of steps of which marching 10 metres is the 1st step.
>
>What your effectively saying is that you'll allow two
>gob fulls of abuse before you end up sin binning on
>the 3rd gobful. Thats not acceptable in any way shape
>or form.
>
>This problem needs to be eliminated from ball one
>
>The only way to eliminate it is to do one of two
>things -
>
>1. Change the current rule to allow the mark to be
>advanced much more than the current 10 metres. In AFL
>the 50 metre advancement is equivalent to 1/3rd of the
>length of the field. So in Rugby League a fair call in
>my opinion is to advance the mark 30 or 40 metres
>
>2. If the powers that be will not allow the suggested
>rule change as described in item one above then
>referees united as a group need to make a stance and
>immediately start sin binning **EVERY** player who due
>to back chat is marched 10 metres. That will solve the
>problem quick smart !
>
>As I previously pointed out, players treat the 10m
>advancing of the mark with distain, we now have
>players laughing at our officials who do this. The
>referees need to up to anti if they want to stop this
>sort of crap from festering into something even more
>serious than what is currently in play


Advancing the mark for a player blowing out of frustration, i dont think warrents more, but a player directing dissent at the referee should be automatically sin binned. i think each case should be judged on its merits. why do we always think by changing the rules we will solve all our problems, in most cases it omly creates more

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+10
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.